Layton should back Harper!.... Maybe

That's right, prop him up. That may seem like crazy talk especially from someone like me who has been calling for the end of the Harper government since its inception and who has to spit on the ground , excuse me, everytime he even says the word Harper. It's just that the only thing I can imagine being worse and more embarrassing on the world stage would be an Ignatieff government.

Do Ignatieff's supporters really expect the support of the NDP at anytime? Oh yeah we don't mind that you totally fucked us on the coalition. Now that the Liberals feel better about their position and their finances we should stand up with them and bring down Harper at the time of their choosing? Fuck that. Suddenly Liberals are anti-Harper? Nice of you centrist, poll watching assholes to get on board. Unfortunately you're like 70 votes too late.

Harper, whom under normal circumstances should be punted from office as fast as possible, really is fairly toothless right now. His attempts to woo Quebec voters were a terrific failure and all it did was to alienate his base who are pretty pissed at him. In fact it is his drop in Quebec along with a rise in the fortunes of Liberals in Quebec that has their party all horny for an election. Harper can still do some damage by appointing senators and judges but with the right-wing of the Liberal party firmly in control of their party I can't imagine their judges being much better. Paul Martin's Supreme Court choices have already pulled the court to the right. You can bet Ignatieff sure wouldn't appoint any Liberals (His political enemies) to the court.

Anyone with any political smarts whatsoever knows that Obama is on the verge of asking Canada to stay in Afghanistan for another decade or so. He may have secretly done so already. Harper would have one hell of a time saying no. I'll give you that. But you know who would definitely say yes to keeping troops in Afghanistan? Michael Ignatieff. He adores the war in Afghanistan and always has.

By the way there is not an ounce of the hypocritical in the NDP position should they decide to prop up Harper. The NDP was prepared to bring down Harper in order to be in a coalition where we would have some say in what the government were to do. In other words Jack could veto Ignatieff's silliest right-wing ideas and effectively protect the country from both Harper and Ignatieff. Iggy has already shown that he would rather vote with Harper than be Prime Minister of a country where Jack Layton would have some influence on him. Why should the NDP side with him? Especially when the Liberals put up as their man someone who just may be to the right of Harper.

Now having said what I said previously there is still some argument to be made for bringing down the government. No it's not the argument Liberals are making. Hey NDP how could you support Harper? Now that they have their finances in place and the party "braintrust" has rammed their man into the leadership we should support them. Like there is any difference between them and the Cons. The most compelling reason would be the possible end of one of the two right-wing leaders that bring our once great nation down. It is rumored that another minority for Harper and he would be on the outs with the party. It is also rumored that an election loss for Ignatieff would send him back to Harvard and out of our lives for good. Both of these developements could only be good for Canada. However there are some very bad things that could happen. Canadians could turn on the Liberals because of Ignatieff's obviously self serving election call and give Harper his majority. Harper with a majority is very dangerous. Or Canadians could finally decide they have had enough of Harper and give Ignatieff a majority. An equally scary proposition.

I think the best course of action would to be exactly what Layton seems to be doing, let Harper decide. He can come around and give the NDP some of what they are asking for, ( ATM fees seems to be one Harper wouldn't anger his base with too much) stay in power and be a hero to Canadians who want an election like they want a root canal. Or Harper could continue to refuse to budge, be held somewhat responsible for an unwanted election and risk losing his job. The NDP would come out looking pretty good either way and as usual with our principles intact.

Pimp my vote

I have never been a very prolific blogger, averaging only 1 post every 2 weeks in my first year of blogging. However lately I haven't been writing at all. I just haven't had the zest for it. I attribute this mostly to Dion's capitulation on Afghanistan and the crime bill. This same malaise has come over me regarding the election.
I live in Winnipeg South Centre represented by Anita Neville and I voted for her last election. This has traditionally been a safe Liberal seat. This year however it is being targeted hard by the Conservatives. Neville is leading by about 5 percent according to a poll done by the Winnipeg Free Press. The Tories are running an ex-Blue Bomber place kicker named Trevor Kennard and feel they have a real shot. The NDP have a lot of supporters in this riding and usually do very well also. If there was ever a time to support Ms Neville this is it . I don't think I can do it however and look myself in the mirror. That's right, "themilitantliberal" won't be voting Liberal.
I watched live as Ms Neville cast her vote to extend the Afghanistan Nightmare and it was my personal worst moment in politics. I cannot in good conscience risk putting blood on my hands again by voting for a Liberal Party that still contains way too many Ignatieffs. I don't however want to put another Con in the House of Commons by splitting the progressive vote in my riding.
Until recently this was my dilemma and the source of my depression. I think I may have discovered an answer though. There has been a lot of talk in the blogosphere and in the media over the last few days about a Facebook group called "Anti-Harper vote swap Canada." For those of you who don't know what it is about, it is basically a site where those of us on the broad left can swap votes from different ridings to try to assure that the party with the best chance of beating the Conservative candidate gets enough support to do it. For example, an NDP supporter in a riding that has no chance of an NDP victory could swap his vote with a Liberal in another riding where the Liberal has no chance of winning. This way your vote can count somewhere where it makes a difference. I think this is the greatest idea ever. I haven't joined the group because I'm not on Facebook and really don't want to be on Facebook but I thought I could express a similar notion here.
I have decided in this election I would like to support the Green party. A Green party vote in my riding won't do anybody any good. However, I am still willing to cast my vote for Anita Neville in my riding if there is a liberal in Central Nova who will vote for Lizzie May in my name. There must be many Liberals in the riding who would like to vote Liberal but are unable to because of the arrangement between Ms May and Mr Dion. I can give you that Liberal vote in a riding that could really use one. It is win,win. We get to vote our conscience and hopefully keep the Tories out of two seats. Now truthfully there is a pretty good chance Ms Neville will win with or without my support and there is a pretty good chance Ms May will lose with or without your vote. Obviously it would be much better if the idea caught on with other individuals in the same boat as me. It also may be very close in my riding and as for Central Nova, I can think of no better way of making my vote count than unseating the evil and treacherous Peter McKay.
So if you live in Central Nova and are willing to vote Green and want me to vote Liberal let me know. I will also consider trades with Liberals in a dipper riding. Like I said it's win,win. Vote strategically and follow your heart.

Please not Judge Toews!!

Recent speculation has ex Justice Minister and current Treasury Board President Vic Toews accepting a patronage appointment as a federal Judge in Manitoba. It seems he may have a tough time getting re-elected in his ultra Conservative riding. Apparently these folks may have a problem with his recent divorce and an even bigger problem with the fact that he knocked up another lady out of wedlock. Vic and his boss, of course, rallied against patronage appointments while in opposition. To most Canadians, this may seem like good riddance but what about us Manitobans who may have to be subjected to the tender mercies of Vic Toews and his Spanish Inquisition outlook on justice. This is the man who campaigned for re-election to the Manitoba Legislature with a great plan to snuff out drugs in schools by randomly deploying sniffer dogs to terrorise children. A practice the Supreme court recently outlawed. This Steinbacho-fascist has no business judging a pig calling contest never mind deciding the punishments of unsuspecting Manitobans who run afoul of the law. Mr. Toews, when he was Justice Minister, appointed some of the very people who would be approving his application to become a Judge. That is a move worthy of Stalin.

This is exactly the reason the Libs and everyone else need to force an election sooner rather than later. While everyone has sat around acting like Harper hasn't done anything too ideological and waited for the polls to get better, Harper has appointed 165 judges. At least that is what some Conservative Asshole on "Duffy Live" was saying the other day. 165! We better start building some more prisons. Harper has even announced some crazy plan to elect the next Supreme Court Justice. He, of course, would still have the final say. Losing the Supreme Court would be worse than a Harper Majority. Wake up and smell the police-state, these incremental changes and appointments don't seem like much until you add them all up and you turn around and you're living in America.

Three Amigos? ...How about Three Cheaters !

Frances Russell is one of my favorite writers and represents the entire left wing of the Winnipeg Free Press. Her column today "Were the 2006 election results tainted? " talks about the Conservatives and the " In and out scandal ". Russell seems to think that the extra million the Cons allegedly had to spend on advertising may have changed a few minds.

This along with the RCMP announcing during the election that they were investigating the Liberals may have made the difference in who would form a minority. The RCMP, as Russell points out, seemed to have deliberately changed their policy on announcing criminal investigations during elections.

Could it be true? Could the state police have colluded with the party they favored and attempted to subvert democracy? Did the Tories deliberately overspend beyond the advertising limits also subverting democracy? I hope not because just as Lizzie May says, "Canada is not a banana republic".

All of this talk about subverting democracy got me thinking about George Bush, elected in two questionable elections himself. As a matter of fact Mexican President Calderon was elected under massive protest and allegations of vote rigging. It's nice to know that these three can get together in our name and discuss NAFTA and SPP and sell out all our interests to a small corporate elite and turn all three countries into Oligarchys.

Dion lets down Canada

I just finish up carpentry school for the year in time for the latest scandal to come out of Stephen Harper's scandal free gov't. As we all know by now, it looks as if the conservative party may have tried to buy a dying man's vote with a million dollar life insurance policy. Now that's classy. I have no idea if these allegations are true but I actually hope they are not because they're just that slimy. It really doesn't seem to matter much if dirt sticks to Harper or not on account of the absolutely spineless behavior displayed by the Liberal leadership and Stephane Dion. I've been blogging for a year now and have defended Mr Dion many times. I supported his plan to leave Canadian troops in Afghanistan till 2009 even though I wanted the troops out immediately because I thought it was a plan that Canadians would support and anything was preferable to the Conservative plan which calls for Canadian troops to fight and die in the Middle East until the end of time. I believed like many Liberals that he would pull the party to the left. For awhile it seemed that he might, he was prepared to let the most offensive parts of the Anti-terrorism act die by refusing to support their renewal. A position he has since sadly reversed. He was sticking to his guns on that 2009 withdrawal date and he was properly instructing the senate to pass nothing. Unfortunately this is no longer the case. The last few weeks have been nothing short of shameful for anyone who is Liberal. Is Ignatief a Jedi knight? Does he just wave his hand in front of otherwise sensible people and they loose their fucking minds and start getting into bed with conservatives and extending bullshit wars that half the people in this country want over like right now. Who the fuck speaks for us now? Jack Layton? He's the only one talking any sense when it comes to this war. The Dippers also make sense when they accuse Liberal Mp's of caring more about their seats then they do about doing the right thing. "Boo-hoo my riding has a military base I can't run an election campaign on the war." Not only did Dion drop his pants when it came to the war, he and the Liberal leadership have failed miserably by letting Harper's Crime bill pass. The number one job of all Liberal Mp's, Senators and judges is to make sure that no Conservative anywhere at any time passes a crime bill of any variety. These people have an outlook on crime rooted some where in the middle ages and should never be allowed to subject Canadians to any of their backward social engineering. If you don't get that and you think Harper's crime bill was "moderate" you are a Liberal in name only. Then of course there is the budget. It's true that it didn't contain any poison pills but the last two sure did. If Dion doesn't like this budget he should vote against it. Fuck Harper's threats. I hate to agree with Rex Murphy but he was completely right last week when he said "at some point the opposition has got to well, oppose." Harper might as well have his majority because he is getting away with everything he tries. Mr Dion stop listening to the people around you who's greatest fear seems to be an election and stand up for Canada.

What's up with the flag?

So I guess Conservatives want us to know exactly what country they are ruining. They have a flag the size of a barn door dwarfing our beloved Prime Minister, (insert your own joke) at their celebration for being in office for 2 years. (Shudder). The flag looks like something out of an Orwell novel or one of those hysterical rallies the Nazi's used to throw back in the 30's. What jingoistic nonsense. My favorite part is the giant shadow cast by Mr. Harper on the bottom left corner. Besides casting his shadow over Canada, Harper used the occasion to agree in principle with John Manley that Canadian troops should stay in Afghanistan until the end of time provided we get some helicopters and a thousand more NATO troops. I must say I find it hard to believe that Manley and Harper would be in agreement. Sure their both continentalist American lapdog, war mongering, supply side economist, big business friendly dicks, but Manley is far more to the right then Harper. Ok you got me , you can't be more to the right than Harper but Manley is certainly no Liberal. Bi-partisan commission indeed. Bring home the boys, toss out these bums and let's go back to showing our pride in Canada, not by waving really big flags and taking sides in tribal warfare, but by showing leadership on the environment and on achieving peace through negotiation and diplomacy. You know like adults.

What's up Quebec? You used to be cool.

One of my few regrets is that I never really took advantage of Trudeau's vision and learned to speak French. I say this because I have often, in my uninformed past, mused about moving my family to La Belle province. Quebec seemed like such a hip and progressive place, a socially liberal mecca. Almost like a little piece of Europe in the middle of Canada. $7 a day daycare, strong union and labour movements, multi-cultural ism that was not only happening but also working. A province that was not afraid to trade and engage with America, but was unwilling to bow to her. Sophisticated, worldly, cigarette-smoking intellectuals who hate war and love sex. A group that skewed Canadian public opinion further to the left than it otherwise would be. Stephen Harper himself said it when he talked about how if you took Quebec out of the polls, 50% of Canadians were all for sending Canadian troops to Iraq. 50%!! These morons never got their way for one reason, Quebec.
It seemed that Canada needed Quebec. A province always on the right (left) side of every issue. A place with no time for the backward ideas espoused by so many Western Canadian and American right-wing troglodytes. Sure they wanted to separate from Canada, but I figured this was only because they felt Canada was holding them back from becoming the socialist utopia they would become if it wasn't for Conservative English Canada. Hell, even their own Conservative party was made up of Red Tories, much closer in ideology to Joe Clark than Stephen Harper. The leader of the Separatists was a coke-snorting homosexual so they couldn't be all bad. Boy was I wrong!
It turns out the Bloc is made up of two wings. The social liberals I mentioned are there, but they all live in Montreal. The rest of the Bloc seems to be made up of rural, French-Catholic nationalists who not only hate the rest of Canada, but are intolerant of Muslims and Jews too. Many of these people decided they were going to support Mario Dumont and his merry band of racist assholes in the provincial election. And even worse, support Stephen Harper federally. They know Harper won't let them separate but they know he will give them more and more provincial power or "autonomy" as they see it.
The people of Herouxvilles are the perfect example of what is wrong with Quebec. The town council's "code of conduct" for minorities introduced last winter was ridiculously racist and embarrassing to any Canadian who values tolerance. It didn't however lead to much outrage. Instead people seemed to nod their heads and start talking about "reasonable accommodations" and how they have gone too far. (The Globe and Mail have an excellent comment editorial in the Saturday, October 27th edition regarding this issue.)
There seems to be a big backlash against Muslims and multi-cultural ism. The French just elected immigrant-bashing, George Bush-loving, right-wing dickhead Nicolas Sarkozy. The Dutch, too, have hardened their attitudes on immigration. Hell, I even raise one eyebrow in a condescending manner towards our Liberal friends in Ontario who just elected a government almost exclusively based on one issue, funding for faith-based schools. Were you against funding for faith-based schools because it's wrong for all faiths? Which it is. Or did you not want Muslim schools getting money? I hope it is the former. Heir Harper has not failed to notice and exploit this issue inserting into the throne speech his plan to pass a law making sure Muslim women could not vote while wearing a veil. Muslim women, by the way, were not looking for this privilege.
Are we living in crazy world? Federalists in Quebec voting for Stephen Harper. Separatists who don't want to create a European-style welfare state, but instead want to go back to 1940 where everyone was white and the priest was the highest authority. The last thing provinces need is more autonomy or more rights. I live in Manitoba. Without the intervention of a powerful central government in Ottawa and the Charter, the half-wit rednecks who make up this province would soon turn it into Alabama without the southern charm. In spite of this silliness going on out East, a big majority of Quebecers are against the war in Afghanistan and for Kyoto. But by supporting Harper as the federalist option, and weakening the Liberals, they are sure to give Harper the chance to continue his never ending war and his dance on the grave of Kyoto.
The biggest irony of all this is that while Quebecers seem to be taking stupid pills, Albertans who have been dumb enough to vote Conservative since 1971 on the other hand seem to be getting smarter. The provincial government's decision to raise royalties was way overdue. It's not nearly enough, but at least Albertans are making the oil companies take them out to dinner before they fuck them up the ass now. So wake up Quebec, there is a culture war and"tabernac" the good guys need you.

Paul Martin strikes again.

In 1994, having just turned 21, I decided to quit my bullshit job selling cars for 60 hours a week in the worst economy in history. "No problem, this is Canada," thought I. "I'll just sit back and collect my birthright, Unemployment Insurance." Boy was I in for a surprise. Our newly minted finance minister Paul Martin had decided he was gonna cut the deficit and he was gonna do it on the backs of the unemployed and those unfortunate enough to get sick. Medical transfers to the province were completely gutted. And "UI" became impossible to get. It has run something like 60 billion in surplus since then in spite of some changes made later to try and win back the lost Maritime vote. This was the first time Paul Martin had an effect on my life. Right around the same time Martin and the rest of the right wing of the Liberal party were embracing globalization and talked Chretien into not cancelling free trade. He had been elected on a promise to do just that. Anyone who is not an economist or a "Blue Liberal" (growth is all that matters, the market will save all) can easily see what a nightmare free trade has been for us ( 100 Gazillion lost manufacturing jobs, massive exploitation of the poor in all three countries, the loss of labour power world wide and a widening of the gap between rich and poor to the size of the Grand Canyon.) By 1997, the year my Grandmother died, Martin's medical transfer cuts and a provincial Conservative gov't had degraded medicare to the point where I honestly believe that financial considerations may have been considered by hospital staff when deciding whether or not it was worth trying to save her. I don't know this for a fact but I have my suspicions. This was damage done when he was not even leader, the worst was yet to come. When Chretien and other actual Liberals finally were unable to hold back Martin and his cronies any longer he finally got his wish and became Prime Minister. During his short reign at the top Martin did more damage to Canada than Brian Mulroney did in eight years. The worst of his moves was committing Canadian troops to Afghanistan. This one comes back to haunt us every time a Conservative is able to comment, "It was the Liberals who got us into this war." This bullshit war should be hanging around the Conservatives' neck like a great big badge of massive failure. Instead, we, the good guys, get to wear it with them. Mr. Martin was also responsible for signing us up to Security and Prosperity Partnership with the evil Americans. To anyone who pays attention and doesn't make their living selling things to Americans this is the biggest threat to Canadian Sovereignty ever. He also passed the first Canadian law ever to include mandatory minimums. If Harper had tried it it wouldn't have made it past the Supreme Court. But because it was a liberal law the court looked at it in a different light and allowed it. This precedent allows Harper to go crazy with the mandatory minimums and the court won't be able to stop him. What a slippery slope. Speaking of the Supreme Court, Martin's appointments seem to have pulled the court to the right. (Allowing fascist security certificates to stand is just one example.) What a fox in the hen house. Mr. Martin also planned to go along with the United States in their missile defence fantasy but huge public opposition changed his mind. Dodged a bullet on that one. Sheila Copps revealed recently that Mr. Martin tried to get her to spearhead the privatization of the CBC. To her credit she refused. Wow an even bigger bullet. This brings me finally to Martin's last gift that keeps on giving. Some actual Liberals tried to push through a bill decriminalizing marijuana. Mr Martin dithered and watered down the bill for his American buddies. Then he never passed it at all. The Conservatives let the bill die after taking office, (of course they did) and as a result the police have started ruining lives again by arresting users. Possession charges are up 50% in some provinces. What a waste of time and money and people's futures. Just today a bullshit study tying marijuana to psychosis was released giving Conservatives more ammo to use the next time the debate comes up. This is defeat snatched from the jaw's of victory. Thanks Paul Martin, thanks for nothing. It is my hope that Chretien's move to stop corporate donations will mean the right-wing will have less of an influence on the direction of the party. If not I guess there is always the NDP.

Woo-hoo! The Tories Suck!

I have had an extra spring in my step the last couple of days, in spite of working outside in some ridiculous heat and humidity. I'm pretty sure it's a case of "schadenfreude", a German word that means taking pleasure from someone's misery and misfortune. Who's misery? The CPC and Deceivin' Stephen Harper.
Decima's new poll has the Libs back in the lead at 32%, and the Cons. 29%, NDP 18%, Greens 9% and the Bloq 9%. Yes, polls don't mean much, but it is still good news and the trend is in the right direction.
Tories are tanking in Atlantic Canada! Nova Scotia Premier Roddy McDonald has joined my boy Danny Williams, the Premier of Newfoundland, in bashing Stephen Harper for what they say is a broken promise not to change the Atlantic Accord. (Side note: Why do I see so many posts bashing Danny Williams? Who cares if he wants his cake and eats too. He's a one-man Stephen Harper trashing machine. He's like a constant free negative ad.) Conservative MPs in Nova Scotia certainly have some 'splaining to do. MP Bill Casey did the right thing and voted against it. Harper, who is falling apart like a '78 Pinto, responded to complaints from Premier McDonald, a Conservative, by basically saying sue me. Huh?! Harper has never liked Atlantic Canada, "culture of defeat", but now he is actively picking a fight with Newfoundland and Nova Scotia voters. I suspect they will show Conservative MPs what defeat is all about. Elizabeth May is looking even better in Central Nova. The thought of Peter McKay losing makes me giggle.
On the Afghanistan front, two-thirds of Canadians believe we should get the fuck out in 2009 at the end of our current mission. I personally believe we should have gotten out long ago. I have advocated for the 2009 withdrawal before though because I believe Canadians will get behind this position. I was right about that. I'm no Nostradamus, I predicted Stockwell Day would go down for buying his way into his riding and boy was I wrong. The RCMP couldn't wait to exonerate Mr. Day. I am concerned however with the new anti-war protests in Quebec. Protesters are sending letters to Canadian troops (Van Doo's) explaining their anti-war position and soliciting them to refuse to go. Everything they say in their letters are right, but I am concerned about their timing. Mr. and Mrs. Mushy-Moderate are on our side right now and this is exactly the kind of behaviour that may send them back into the arms of the fascists. It happened in Vietnam, but I digress. Afghanistan has turned into a nightmare for Stephen Harper and Stephane Dion has just the right position politically, and almost, morally.
There are rumblings that the Senate might block the budget from passing, at least until the end of June, which would effectively kill it. This might actually be good for Harper. If his budget were to pass, Harper's only achievement when he runs back to Calgary after his stunning defeat in the upcoming election, will be passing a budget that gives Quebec enough money to pass a billion dollar tax cut and still maintain more social services than any other province. They must love that in Alberta!
Saskatchewan Premier Lorne Calvert announced today that he'll be taking Harper up on his offer to sue him as Mr. Calvert is also apparently unhappy with being lied to concerning Saskatchewan's equalization take.
Lumberjack Chuck Strahl is facing a court challenge from the "friends of the Wheat Board" and others who say the federal government cannot remove barley from the Wheat Board monopoly without an act of Parliament. Duh! The Supreme Court already ruled on this when Mulroney tried to pull barley out of the single-desk in the '80's. He must go the the House and he certainly doesn't have the votes there. The Wheat Board is gonna live, baby! These thugs are done! It's over! Bring on the election! (Anyone else notice how much better Dion's English is getting?) Even Adler is depressed, now that is "schadenfreude"!

Love that Elizabeth May

Boy oh boy did the Conservatives have a bad week. Their massive incompetence in Afghanistan and their lies to cover up their massive incompetence have been getting them in trouble all week. They are down 10 points in the polls with only their base left supporting them. The opposition parties and for once the press have not let this scandal die, so in an effort to change the channel Conservatives across Canada tried to manufacture their own little scandal. Last Sunday Elizabeth May delivered a sermon in a church she was invited to speak at. During that sermon Miss May quoted an environmentalist who compared the Conservative government's lack of real action to address climate change with Neville Chamberlain's infamous appeasement of Adolf Hitler in 1938. Tories across the country seized on this and immediately tried to turn it into a scandal. Miss May was comparing Stephen Harper to Hitler. Miss May was invoking the holocaust and using it in the context of Canadian politics. What an insult to the Jewish people and blah, blah, blah. There are only two problems with these ridicules accusations. Number one, Miss May never said a word about the holocaust. She quoted someone else who quite rightly compared Conservative inaction on climate change with English inaction on Hitler taking over his neighbor. Secondly, if it is so wrong to use the Neville Chamberlain incident to illustrate a modern point why do Conservatives do it constantly? Conservatives in Canada and the US compared people who were against the Iraq War to Neville Chamberlain. Peter McKay and Stockwell Day have both been caught by Hansard using the Chamberlain analogy in the House of Commons. Miss May pointed this one out herself on Mike Duffy yesterday. I guess Mr McKay and Mr Day have no respect for the magnitude of the holocaust either. What hypocrisy. Nice try guys but this scandal is not going away yet.

NDP Wrong By Doing Right Thing

The NDP has been consistent and absolutely right regarding the mission in Afghanistan from the very beginning. We should not have gone in and we should get out as fast as we can. The latest today from the Globe and Mail has dozens of Afghan prisoners claiming they were treated very well by Canadian soldiers, but were tortured as soon as they were turned over to Afghan authorities. This may be a war crime and is just another reason we should end this colonial nightmare. Now I'm not trying to start yet another debate about Afghanistan. I can talk about sovereignty, war lords, and Russians. Or Pushtuns, corruption, opium, and oil pipelines. I can talk about American hegemony, questionable elections, and puppet ex-patriots, but I'm unlikely to change many minds. If you are for this mission, you can talk about nation building, girls in schools, the tyranny of the Taliban, or how the sacrifice of brave Canadian soldiers cannot be for not. You can talk about Canada punching above its weight, the war on "terror", and American leadership until you are blue-liberal in the face and you're not going to change my mind. This is about convincing the NDP that they must support tomorrow's motion to pull the troops out by 2009. The NDP say they will not vote for this motion because they believe and have always believed that our troops should be pulled out yesterday. This is a very principled position, however it may end up keeping troops in Afghanistan for years to come. If this motion fails and the wheels are not set in motion for a 2009 withdrawal, Harper may get his majority and commit our troops for ever and ever, amen. That is certainly not what the NDP wants! Also, if this motion passes, Harper could not allow it, Bush wouldn't let him. He would have to fight an election on the issue. An election fought on the war in Afghanistan could be very good for the NDP.

Softwood Lumber already?

Oh, oh get out the K-Y jelly the Americans are unhappy with the softwood lumber agreement again. International Trade Minister, party jumper and chief bender over for the Canadian govt David Emerson announced late Friday that "The United States has requested that we consult on federal and provincial government forestry programs and the interpretation of the surge mechanism." In other words the Americans have a problem with assistance programs offered by the Ontario and Quebec governments to the Canadian lumber industry saying it amounts to subsidies. (That old chestnut.) They also object to federal grants, loans, loan guarantees, and tax credits awarded to Canadian lumber producers. Lastly, (for now) they have a problem with our interpretation of the surge mechanism which is essentially a taxation and duty scheme that ties the tax rates paid on Canadian lumber exports to US lumber consumption. They don't have a leg to stand on on any of the above counts but when has that stopped them before? Why would it? Emerson seems quite ready to bend over already saying, "This is a good opportunity for Canada and the United States to once again work closely and to work through our disagreements in a constructive manner." Translation, thank you sir may I have another? The Softwood Lumber deal, made law less then six months ago was already hugely one-sided and essentially rewarded the Americans for breaking the rules of NAFTA. Emerson pretty much admitted as much at that time saying that the deal wasn't ideal but that is was a better alternative to costly litigation and that it would bring "stability to the industry." What stability? Less then six months and the Americans are complaining. These, "consultations" are the second step in the grievance process and amount to nothing more then a shake down. Canada will either capitulate, (don't put it past Emerson) or the next step will be guess what, litigation. We'll be right back where we started from accept with less of a legal leg to stand on. In the Softwood lumber Agreement we negotiated away our rights to use all legal rulings in our favour in the past in any future legal proceeding. More great negotiating. Conservatives shouldn't be allowed to make deals with Americans. They love them so much and want to be them so bad that they essentially give away the farm every time they meet. Each time David Emerson or Micheal Wilson make a deal with the US my bum feels sore. Jesus I think these guys were the negotiating team for the Manhattan Indians. One billion dollars bought us less then six months of lumber peace . It is exactly what critics of the deal said would happen and it would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

From fat kids to hockey

The CBC and others have reported recently on what they are calling a Canadian child obesity epidemic. The reasons for this according to everyone they asked is what the kids are eating. Fast food, soda, chips and cookies. Surprisingly kids prefer eating junk food to healthy snacks! No way. The solutions according to the pointy heads who did the study are to remove soda machines from schools and to make fast food restaurants put warnings on their packaging and to stop advertising to kids. This is supposed to help parents make healthier choices for their kids. Maybe.... but isn't there an easier solution? Sure, of course parents should try to limit the amount of junk their kids eat but once in awhile they should let them off their leash too. Stop holding their hand, stop driving them 3 blocks to school, (this alone would help solve global warming, childhood obesity and road rage all at once). Stop picking them up everywhere they go. Let them ride their skate board and their bike, and let them leave the driveway. Let them play hockey and football and baseball. Stop closing community centers. When I was a kid I didn't stop running or biking or swimming or break-dancing from 1977 through 1987. I ate all the healthy food my mother gave me along with all the junk-food I could get my hands on, like every kid. Kids today spend too much time playing video games it's true but so did we. I remember 6 hour stretches playing Intellivision and drinking Big Gulps. Afterwards though I was allowed to go play hide and seek for 3 hours. So were all the other kids. Oh but times have changed, it's a different world now than it was then. I guess that's true if you mean the world is alot safer now than it was then. Crime is way down from where it was in the 70's and 80's. Pedophiles drove around in their white vans back then too. The Boomers were young and drunk driving their GTO's through your neighbourhood and mine and doing historic damage. Assault, murder, rape and every other violent crime were way more likely then. Yet it is remembered as some innocent past time when we used to be able to leave our doors open and let our kids run free. It's all about perception. The belief is that things are getting worse and worse, crime is out of control and the streets are dangerous. This myth is what Stephen Harper exploits when he talks about cracking down on imaginary crime. When the Americans decided to go hard on crime in the 80's they at least had a crime wave, we don't. Some things have changed for the worse. Gangs are more prevalent, but that is what happens when you cut every program in your welfare state, like Jim Flaherty did in Ontario, and when you close those aforementioned community clubs and kiddie pools. Of course, more kids slip through the cracks and end up easy recruitment targets for gangs. Society forgets about them until a suburban white girl gets caught in the cross-fire on Boxing Day. But even with these gangs running around shooting at each other, you're still much less likely to be shot than you were in the "good old days". This mind set, it seems, has also crept into the NHL. Now I can't pretend to be an expert on today's NHL (I stopped watching when my beloved Jets left town), but the attitude today seems to be that fighting and stick swinging are up. Each time anybody hits anybody with their stick in an ugly way, they get suspended for a longer and longer time. They sometimes even face criminal charges! I've read many sports writers who have even talked about getting rid of fighting!! What a docile little girl's world this has become. There was more stick swinging, fighting and genuine ugly behaviour in one period in a 1977 Flyers game than there was in the whole season last year. But I digress, if you want your kid to be skinny, kick his ass outside!

Get tough on crime, put Stockwell Day in jail.

It's a good thing Stephen Harper has decided to crack down on criminals because apparently there is one in his own cabinet. It seems that in 2000 Mr. Day had just become leader of the Alliance party but was without a seat. It was decided that Mr. Day should be given a safe seat in the southern BC bible belt. MP Jim Hart was willing to take one for the team and give up his seat in Okanagon-Coquihalla. He was hailed as a hero for sacrificing his seat. But was it a sacrifice? It turns out Mr. Hart may have been paid to step aside. The Tories tried to say this was old news and that the RCMP had concluded in 2001 that no wrongdoing had taken place. The RCMP however almost certainly did not have in its possession then, documents which have surfaced recently showing correspondence between Mr. Day's office and Jim Hart which discuss his compensation for giving up his seat. See today's Toronto Star for details. Scott's Diatribes also has an excellent article on the subject. When Harper was first elected I crossed my fingers and said "please put Stockwell Day in the cabinet". Everything that tool does eventually ends up hurting Conservatives. This scandal is gonna be huge. It should be the only thing any Liberal talks about in Question Period and on the news until it brings down these backward trolls who currently run our gov't. My only concern is that the RCMP will try to bury it or exonerate Mr. Day, (I think we know what side those guys are on). Liberal MP Mark Holland is all over this scandal and I don't thing he's gonna let it go. Stephane Dion should stop talking about supporting Harper's super-fascist crime bills and start talking about this scandal. My favorite part of this whole story is how it was the Conservatives' own documents left behind in the opposition offices that are gonna be their undoing. Right wingers just have to write everything down. Maybe it's all the self help books they read? I don't know but I'm sure glad of it. Harper is going down over this or at the very least Day will be the scapegoat and get turfed. Either way, go get 'em Mr Holland.

O'Connor wears clownshoes.

Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor showed he's right on top of the situation in Afghanistan again yesterday. Mr O'Connor said he would make a point of meeting with one Abdoul Noorzai, an Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission official. Mr Noorzai signed an agreement last month to monitor the condition of detainees who have been turned over to Afghan authorities. "I want to look the man in the eyes and I want to confirm that they are going to do what they say they're going to do, I just want assurance from him that he will monitor and he will inform us of any abuses." said O'Connor on Sunday. Sounds great, only one problem, Mr Noorzai didn't bother to show up. I guess he was afraid to look O'Connor in the eyes. I thought Canada was punching above its weight now and demanding respect. This total dis is only the latest in a string of embarrassing incidents for O'Connor. His meeting with Mr. Noorzai was an attempt at damage control already because it came out this week that the Red Cross was not monitoring Afghan detainees on behalf of Canada like he has been saying in the House Of Commons for months. Oops. It has also been reported this week that the family of a soldier accidentally killed in Afghanistan was kept in the dark about what happened for over 8 months. I'm not ready to put the blame for that on O'Connor yet but it did happen on his watch. Why are we handing over combatants to people we don't trust not to torture them? Oh yeah we couldn't hand them over to the US because we knew they would torture them. Why can't we hold them ourselves? Oh yeah because holding these dudes at all just might be a war crime. What a sad day it was when Paul Martin let himself get talked into this silliness by one Rick , "Decade of Darkness", Hillier. What an even sadder day it was when Micheal Ignatiaff stood up and voted with the government to extend the mission. Twenty-four other weasels did too. The saddest day of all of course would be a Harper majority. Then we could look forward to perpetual war with incompetent men like Hillier and O'Connor who obviously know nothing about the history or politics of the region leading boys off to die so they can sit at Uncle Sam's knee and play war games.

Big Daddy Harper will protect us.

Now that Stephane Dion and his band of freedom hating terrorist enablers have voted against extending two provisions of the Anti-terror act which allowed police to arrest and hold people for 72 hours without a warrant or force people to testify at secret hearings I don't know what to do. I'm that scared.What will stop the terrorists now? I'm sure there are many terror cells operating right now about to strike. The RCMP and CSIS know all about them but darn it, they just cant get an arrest warrant. I guess we'll just have to let them strike. Curse those Liberals and all their human rights talk. If only we could have make all the Muslims in every Muslim community testify about their neighbors in secret hearings we could find out all the nefarious plans of those who hate us for our freedoms. Or if we could just get everyone in the Indo-Canadian community to testify we could finally get to the bottom of this 25 year old Air-India investigation. Thank God we have big Daddy Harper and the Conservatives in charge. They understand that in a post 911 world all personal freedoms are trumped by Americans, (and dumb-ass Canadians) need to feel safe. If you want to feel safe demand the government get our troops out of Afghanistan. Poking at a hornets nest is an excellent way to get stung. If you want to feel safe stop hanging out with the worlds biggest state sponsor of terror, the USA. These are the reasons there is any danger at all of an attack on Canada. How come they don't hate Sweden for their freedom? People hate you when you kick in their door, or drop a bomb on their village, or shoot their Father for driving to close to your convoy. Security is an illusion. The idea that you can be safe from a group of people who are determined to harm you if you just take enough precautions and if you just limit your own freedom is a myth.

Dion shows leadership

Stephane Dion is refusing to back down from his decision to let two provisions of the Anti-terrorism act die next week. He does this despite massive and hysterical opposition from the Conservatives, many in his own party and even the senate. The absolute panic shown by the powers that be is a little bit concerning. Clearly the security establishment was caught off guard when Dion decided to let these draconian powers sunset and have gone on an absolute offensive in the media and in the house to have the Liberals change course. Dion to his complete credit has steadfastly refused to bow to this pressure. The fact that there seems to be so many who think that we need to keep these provisions and that they are so able to dominate and influence the debate is the scary part. Why are they so concerned? Are they afraid of looking soft to America? Do they see this as a setback to achieving their integrated security state? Regardless of these fascists both within and without of the Liberal party, (those within should be purged.) Dion stands tall. That's leadership. Harpers attempts at tying this in with the Air-India Inquiry are laughable and it smells like the RCMP is in bed with the Conservatives again trying to make the Libs look bad. Suddenly they needed to use this provision? The Supreme court didn't rule last week. The've known for awhile they could use these provisions and haven't felt the need. This is BS and it will come back to harm Harper among Indo-Canadians whom he seems to think are completely gullible.

Conservatives clueless on environment

Watching clips of new environment minister John Baird appearing before a Commons committee studying the clean air act and smugly telling us that the Tories were not even going to try to meet Kyoto targets through emissions-trading or any way else. I was astonished at how much these guys just don't get it. Polls are showing that the environment, it turns out is much more important to Canadians then conservatives thought and as a result they have pretended to have seen the light and gone green.Yet they still come out saying essentially the same thing they said before about Kyoto. It cant be done and the sky is falling. "Canadians do not want empty promises on a plan that we cannot achieve and they do not want our country to face economic collapse," Huffed Baird to the committee. If conservatives believe that the only way to reach Kyoto targets is to send the country into economic collapse then they are clearly not qualified to be running the country. Baird is just Rona Ambrose with a bad attitude and a junior high come-back.